This video is about comparing AI writing tools GPT-4, Llama, and Claude for SEO content creation and keyword research.
Julian Goldie
The video starts with how to get free access to these AI writing tools through po.com. Then, it dives into an SEO content creation showdown between GPT-4, Llama, and Claude. Here are the details of the showdown:
- The prompt used for the showdown is “write a content blah blah blah insert the keywords. We'll put the keyword there. Let's say, for example, we're trying to rank for ‘Can cats eat bananas, ‘ a question I often ask on this channel.
- Llama's output is the longest among the three, and it includes formatted headings and bullet points. However, it goes off on tangents and doesn't answer the question directly.
- Claude's output is the shortest, and it is written in a conversational style. It answers the question, but it doesn't provide the most value upfront.
- GPT-4's output is also not bad. It answers the question but it doesn't get straight to the point either.
- In terms of SEO content creation score, Llama is the winner (35), followed by Claude (18) and GPT-4 (14).
The video then compares these AI writing tools for keyword research. Here are the findings:
- Claude generates keywords with competition scores and search volumes, however these data might not be accurate.
- Llama generates long-tail keywords that are not likely to have a high search volume.
- Overall, Claude seems to be a better option for AI keyword research.
In conclusion, the video suggests that Llama is the best option for SEO content creation, while Claude is better for keyword research. However, it is important to note that the results might be different if you use these AI writing tools on their native platforms.
Credits to: Video Source
#EPIC #SEO #Showdown #CHATGPT4 #LlAMA #CLAUDE